JPEG vs WebP vs AVIF: Which Format Should You Use in 2026?
A practical comparison of JPEG, WebP, and AVIF for compression ratio, browser support, and visual quality, with guidance on when to use each format.
Written and reviewed by the Compress To KB editorial team. Last updated September 24, 2026. We build and maintain the compressor this guide refers to, so what we say about how it behaves comes from its actual code and from day-to-day use, not from guesswork.
Searching for a quick way to shrink a photo usually ends the same way: you land on a free website, drag your file in, wait a few seconds and download the result. It feels instant and harmless. But the word "online" hides a step that matters. For most of these tools, your photo is sent across the internet to someone else's computer before you get it back. When the photo is a holiday snap, that may not bother you. When it is a passport picture, a signed document or a child's school photo, it deserves a moment's thought.
A server-based compressor works in a simple sequence. Your browser sends the file to the site's server, the server runs an encoder, and the result is offered back as a download. Between those steps the file exists on infrastructure you do not control. Depending on the service, it may be written to disk, copied to a cloud storage bucket, recorded in logs, passed through a content delivery network or scanned by automated systems. Many reputable services delete files after a stated period, and some do it well. The point is that you are relying on a promise, and you can rarely verify it. Privacy policies vary enormously in how specific they are about retention, and some reserve broad rights to process uploaded content.
None of this means every online tool is malicious. It means the safety of your file depends on a company's practices, staff access rules, security and continued good behaviour, all of which can change after you have already uploaded.
Photos from phones and cameras often carry an EXIF block: the device model, date and time, camera settings and, if location services are enabled, GPS coordinates that can pinpoint where the picture was taken, sometimes to within a few metres. Most people never see it. That is precisely the problem. Sharing a photo of your front door, your child's playground or your desk at work can leak an address without any visible sign. The standard is described on Wikipedia's Exif page for anyone who wants the technical background.
A server-side converter may keep that metadata intact, discard it or store it, and you generally cannot tell which. Many social platforms strip it on upload, but a random file-sharing or converter site owes you nothing of the sort.
The risk is not evenly spread across image types. A landscape photograph is low stakes. A scan of an identity card, a signed form, a bank statement page or a medical report is a different matter, because these images can be used for impersonation or fraud if they ever leak. Job and exam applications regularly ask you to shrink exactly these documents to a tiny size, so people often end up uploading their most sensitive files to the first compressor a search engine shows them. If you are preparing documents for a form, our step-by-step piece on compressing images for government portals shows how to do it without sending anything anywhere.
Modern browsers can decode, redraw and re-encode images entirely on your own device using JavaScript and the Canvas API. That is how Compress To KB works: the file you select is read by your browser, drawn onto a canvas, encoded again at different quality levels until the size fits, and offered back as a download. At no point in that pipeline does the image need to travel to a server, and we do not operate an image-processing backend that could receive it. The website's pages and scripts are downloaded to you, but your photo does not move in the other direction.
A useful side effect is that the output normally does not carry the original EXIF block, because a canvas re-encode produces a fresh file containing pixels rather than the metadata. We would still encourage you to confirm that on your own files with an EXIF viewer if location privacy matters to you, and not to treat it as a guarantee.
You do not need to trust any website's claims, including ours. You can test them yourself in about a minute:
On a genuinely client-side tool nothing like that appears while compression runs. To be transparent about what you may see instead: like most websites, pages here may load third-party scripts for traffic measurement and advertising, and those show up in the list as separate requests. They are page-level services that do not receive your image. Our Privacy Policy describes what those services are and what they can and cannot see.
In the interest of balance, local processing is not perfect. It uses your own device's memory and processor, so very large images or an old phone can be slower than a powerful server. Browsers also differ in which formats they can encode, which is why our tool checks at runtime what your browser supports rather than assuming. And browser-based does not mean you can stop thinking: you still choose where the compressed file is saved and who you send it to afterwards. What it removes is a whole category of risk, the middleman holding a copy of your image.
For sensitive pictures that need shrinking to a strict limit, that trade is easy to justify. If you want to see what the process looks like end to end, try the 50KB compressor or the 100KB compressor with a harmless test image while watching the Network tab, and decide for yourself whether it meets your standard.
Uploading is a decision, not a default. For casual images it is often fine. For anything that identifies you, your family or your location, prefer a tool that keeps the work on your device, verify the claim yourself once, and strip location data at the source. If you also publish images on a website of your own, the same habit of careful handling carries over to how you prepare them, which we cover in our guide to image size and mobile SEO.
A practical comparison of JPEG, WebP, and AVIF for compression ratio, browser support, and visual quality, with guidance on when to use each format.
A step-by-step guide to compressing photos and signatures under 50KB for SSC, UPSC, state PSC, and other government exam portals without losing clarity.
Why unoptimized images are the biggest cause of poor Core Web Vitals scores, and how reducing image weight improves LCP, load time, and search rankings.